For years, the original YSL All Hours Foundation reigned supreme in my makeup bag. It was, and for many still is, a holy grail for those seeking a medium-to-full coverage foundation with exceptional longevity. Before diving into a review of the 2016 iteration (keeping in mind formulations can subtly change over time, even within the same product line), let's establish a baseline understanding of what made the original so beloved. For those unfamiliar with it, I'd describe the original All Hours as a luxurious, almost creamy, foundation that provided flawless coverage without feeling heavy or cakey. It mastered the art of blurring imperfections while still looking natural, a feat many foundations struggle to achieve. Its long-lasting wear was legendary – truly all-day wear, even for oily skin types like mine. It didn't oxidize significantly, and the finish, while matte, wasn't flat or drying. It was, in short, perfection. Or so I thought, until the reformulations started.
This review focuses on the 2016 version of the YSL All Hours Foundation, comparing it to its predecessor and examining its performance against other YSL offerings, including the Touche Éclat line and cushion foundations. We’ll also delve into the broader context of cushion foundations versus traditional liquid foundations, and examine UK-specific reviews and shade availability.
The 2016 YSL All Hours Foundation: A Critical Examination
My initial experience with the 2016 version was…disappointing. While it retained some of the hallmarks of the original – the impressive longevity, for instance – several key aspects felt altered. The texture, while still creamy, seemed slightly thinner, resulting in a less buildable coverage. Where the original allowed for effortless layering to achieve a more dramatic look, the 2016 version felt more resistant to building, sometimes appearing patchy if layered too heavily. This was a significant departure from the seamless, almost airbrushed finish of the original.
The staying power, thankfully, remained largely intact. It still held up remarkably well throughout the day, even with my combination skin. However, the slightly altered texture meant it didn't quite "melt" into the skin as flawlessly as its predecessor. This resulted in a slightly less natural, more noticeable finish, particularly under close inspection.
The shade range, while improved from previous years, still fell short of being truly inclusive. This is a common critique of many high-end foundations, and YSL, despite its reputation, hasn't always been exemplary in this area. The availability of shades might also vary depending on your region, hence the importance of consulting the YSL foundation shade guide before purchasing. For those in the UK, finding the right shade might require a bit more effort, as highlighted in many YSL foundation review UK posts.
Comparison to Other YSL Foundations: A Multi-faceted Look
current url：https://gkpwmt.k286t.com/bag/new-ysl-foundation-2016-review-6986/